Introduction to the Study of The Secret Doctrine

"one true reality" is false...

--> Theosophy disagrees with you.

The separateness you're describing is also an illusion.

--> And it is an intentional and necessary illusion, as explained in the Stanzas of Dzyan.

Then all you have been saying about rational mind and learning to think without it -- whether it was you, or just quoting that video -- is all a trifle.

If you can't see the other side to every coin, no matter what... You haven't found the One...

I would have said nice talking to you, but now I see I'm not talking to someone who thinks for themselves... I am talking to Theosophy directly. Doctrine etched into the stone of your heart is it? Very well then, Mercury will go on juggling elsewhere.

Daniel,

Thank you for having taken the time to see if any Theosophical ideas fit into your belief system. I wish you well on your search for people who agree with your belief system.

Mercury is the trickster. I was never here to re-consider that which I already read about in the Secret Doctrine. It was clear to me on the first pass through the book that it was not meant to be taken literally. You are another flavor of Christian, but I had hoped since you had been exposed to a doctrine so purely analogous to what is really being said that you would perhaps have hope of seeing what you have studied so deeply really is. This has been an interesting experiment in conception but dull in practice.

I am amazed that, even when the information is spoon-fed to you with a sugary coating, you cannot taste the worth underneath the layer of frosting. It seems that intellect transcends even literary ability and memory. There is just simply a certain combination of aptitudes which must all must be of a minimum proficiency and in harmonious congruence with each other, or only illusion can prevail.

This has been a tiny bit of insight into mindless automatons at least, so it wasn't a total waste. Good day to you