Jekyll & Hyde Wolf, Independent & Antis Win!

Everytime i try to point out antis, it always gets me killed. Remember when I told everyone Sarahuk was anti in the DW game and i was sure of myself but I got voted off because all the pros weren't sure if they could trust me? Then it turned out she was in fact anti after I was killed. The antis won too. Then again that was the first day phase. And by telling everyone I knew who was anti, they were all so hellbent on getting rid of me and it worked. So I toned it down a bit. The only anti I was sure of this time was Missing who was pro this phase and anti last. I still don't know why she wanted to die. I mean she could have died as anti this round and helped the pros by converting an anti. That was a point I was trying to make but no one listened to me. I don't know if she was going to die anyway because of the Doctor finding her or what. All I know is we could have had two antis to deal with then three.

And if Sry was anti, I don't think he would be drawing so much attention to himself. Then again half the power roles are dead so he might think he has a better chance coming out into the open. So since the odds seem somewhat against us, I'll say what I think and I'll likely die anyway,

Sarahuk's not posting much but if she were anti, I'd think she'd post a little bit more then she is now. But she did vote for the two main people that were voted off. Stokes and TMW. Coincidence? And did she know the other pro would die along with her because I didn't. I didn't read the roles too well. So I was shocked when we lost her. I thought she had to give up the role of Mr. Hyde because of the shock of finding her out. i didn't know she died too. So was her intentions to get rid of two pros?

I have a strong vibe about Raven. Just something I couldn't shake since day two. I feel like she's there in the background. Could be she doesn't have enough time on the board.

You, I have been going back and fourth between you honestly.

Aris is new. I usually tend to pick on the newbies and when she agreed with Aislinn on the Doctor hinting who they investigated it made me think that maybe Aris is pro and Aislinn is anti. She can always full me. But then you think about it. The odds seem likely against us so maybe like I am, we should all come out in the open and stat who we think id anti and pro and see what happens. If we don't kill an anti at the end of this phase, I'm certain the antis win so perhaps listening to the investigator right now is a good thing.

I don't blame TMW for wanting to die. The only way Jekyll/Hyde wins in this game is by surviving as an anti or dying as a pro. Why not win while the winnings good?

The only thing I'll say about the Day 3 thing? It would've been even nicer to bring back a pro... especially considering at the time, it would've been a 50/50 chance between a power role and a regular pro (at least if I'm reading Jekyll/Hydes role properly).

Either way, Angel, I still don't trust you. I definitely agree that we need to listen to the Detective right now, as they're our only hope. However, why would the Detective walk out into the open now that they're the only remaining pro power role?

Well I'll be honest, I'm really not sure what to think yet. I am still leaning towards Syriani simply because of the way he was acting, I think it threw everyone off and wasn't helpful at all. Then he comes in and votes for Seraphim but I don't see that she is acting off or has done anything suspicious, unless I'm missing something.

I just think its strange that Syriani comes in and names her so quickly without any discussion. But then again, maybe he is still trying to keep us off balance--I don't know.

I honestly don't get an anti vibe from Aislinn and I also try to give the newbie a little leeway as I know it's hard to play the first time around. Angel, I haven't made up my mind as once again, you have confused me. I don't know why, but I'm somehow thinking you aren't as innocent as you are claiming. But again, I haven't been able to come to a conclusion yet.

I don't think I'm missing anyone...but I haven't had much chance to go back through and read everything yet, I will be going back through hopefully tomorrow (I'm only working a half day ) and will be trying to decide on who to vote for at that time.

As to me not being on, yes I've just been busy with RL but I do try to get on at least once a day (sometimes I do try to sneak on at lunch when I can--shhhhh ).

well can't the detective pm who they pm? If they can it would be best to use them as a mouth piece for the detective? But even if we don't do that, how can we find an anti without them. That's if the detective even found an anti.

But i think i'm going to vote:

Sarahuk

She voted everyone off and that's gone unoticed. Yes I said because of her vote for Stokes, someone else didn't die but that was pure luck. And I didn't think much off it and figured she was a power role wanting to safe herself but then she votes for TMW who takes out another power role. Sarahuk could have been hoping for two eliminations the first day. And two the second day. It's all a little fishy.

Ok, so we're making lists now? I'll give it a go.

Angel325girl - My dear you always confuse me as well, and that makes me leery of voting for you.
Seraphim - I don't what to make of you either.
Syriani - You're another one that confuses me. But with the way you made such a spectacle, I'm gonna say you're probably pro. Or could you be an anti trying to make us think you're pro.
Raven524 - Raven I don't get an anti vibe from you either.
sarahuk - I think you're being quiet is not a good sign for you. I'm not saying that makes you anti, but just saying it makes me suspicious. Like you're trying to fly under the radar.
ArisaKatsu - You're new, so not sure what to expect from you. I don't know about you either.

Just a head's up that I'm in Cape Cod this weekend. Motel has no wifi. On phone now, but will not be on until Sunday.

Have a good time Seraphim, but hopefully you can get back on before the end of the day phase as we need all the pro's to win this.

I've gone back over the posts, we need to be careful because if we don't get this right and vote off a pro, then I think the anti's will win if my math is right. But here is what I think:



Aislinn - I'm thinking you're pro, your arguments on the first day seemed to make sense and you appear to be trying to help the town.
Seraphim - I also think you are pro, I don't see anything to make me suspicious about you.
sarahuk - I'm leaning towards pro, but I'm not 100% sure yet.
ArisaKatsu - As I said, you're new so I'm not sure about you either, but something just has me leaning a bit towards anti for some reason. I can't put my finger on it so for now you're still in the unsure column for me.
Syriani - The way you voted for penguins and Starkiller who isn't even playing feels like a diversion to me. Then you vote for Yoda at one point, who when not voted off gets killed. I started to wonder if you were anti, who were you trying to provide cover for? So right now, I'm leaning towards you being anti. The only reason I'm hesitating is because I know you've not always done what I'd expect.
Angel325girl - You were pretty vocal during the first day phase, which isn't unusual and you appeared to try to be coming up with a plan. But when I went back and read through all your posts, your help felt like it would be more beneficial to the anti's than pro's. Yoda and Aislinn pointed this out, especially Yoda who eventually ended up being killed. Then you voted for Stokes which I figured at first was just a random vote, but when Sarahuk broke the tie, you didn't change your vote. Which then got me thinking, why wouldn't you change your vote if you believed keeping it spread out at least meant only one person would be eliminated? Now you are voting for another person who is inactive (easy pickings for anti's). I was still confused though but then your last few posts seem as if you are trying to defend yourself when I didn't see anyone really voting you off or saying they were overly suspicious of you. Which means right now I am pretty sure you are anti.

I feel strongly enough about it that I'm gonna actually put in my vote:

vote=angel

Because I voted for Stokes first. It wasn't my fault Sarahuk voted for them. Yes we didn't lose two people and if I changed my vote we might have lost someone much more then a townie. So I chanced it. I I knew not everyone would follow me. By everyone i mean the antis. They wouldn't want to risk dying the first day phase since there are three of them and would have been under a lot of pressure. That's when they slip up. Get nervous. Had I known Stokes would still be up for the Walking Stick ahead of time, I wouldn't have voted differently.

Yes Yoda was so against the idea because she was a power role but she still went along with my idea. All of the power roles did I'm sure. But if I changed my vote to spread out the votes like I originally wanted, someone besides a townie could have died. I intended on making the elimination random but the town seemed adamant about having two eliminations and because i wanted to avoid that some were suspicious of me? And if I unvoted Stokes, I could have killed a power role. and then everyone would have been even more suspicious of me for unvoting Stokes. The town told me numerous times a two elimination was unavoidable. So like I said. I chanced it in the end. That's the whole point of the game right? Since some of us can't detect or follow anyone this is what I had to resort too. It's better to trap the antis when they're outnumbered. Not even they are safe of random eliminations but I had a strong feeling Stokes wasn't a power role. Just like i had a stronger feeling he wouldn't vote. Also If I told everyone to vote for Stokes, would you? I think not. You would just have said I was anti trying to get rid of a pro.

Current Votes
Seraphim (1) - Syriani
Sarah (1) - Angel
Angel (1) - Raven

Mr Hyde's List
Seraphim
aislinn
sarahuk
ArisaKatsu

hi everyone. i'm back (and safe and sound with my wifi!!). glad to see there was some discussion while i was gone.

I think a lot of valid points were made, but it seems to me that Raven knows what she's talking about. I'm gonna trust her this time around.

vote: Angel

wow. Guess you guys let the antis win this one.

Sorry Angel, but after a little detective work by reading through your post, your true colors have come through. The only way the anti's will win is if the pro's don't vote you off this time.

I've read everything and I have to admit that I am growing more suspicious of Angel. But, I also have to admit that the more I think about it the more I'm weary of Syriani. He's a very good player and I'm kinda thinking that his eratic behavior could be his way of hiding in plain sight.

I'm going to hold off voting for now. Good agruments have been made against Angel, but I really need a little more time.

I'll vote by tomorrow as I don't want to face the Walking Stick. I just want to be sure of my vote as this is a very important one.

Weary or Wary?

Perhaps you have grown weary of me.


Alas, I stand by my vote for Seraphim, because from what I can tell there is no real reason to switch to Angel. Or perhaps there is.

Even so, I'm not moving my vote from Seraphim unless something comes up later this day phase.

Well, what am I kidding, I don't have the patience to wade through paragraphs and paragraphs of posts anymore.


Back to my Signals and Systems homework!

From what I've gathered, my suspicions are collecting between a few people still.

It seems that quite a few people have pretty convincing arguments against Angel, though she is pretty adamant that her loyalties lie with the pros.

Syriani's past behavior is still a bit suspect as well. Quiet possibly a bold cover.

I for one, don't think the quiet players are trying to hide or stay "under the radar". Perhaps this is my inexperience, but it would seem to me that an anti would be more active, and be trying to persuade the town to vote their way.

This in turn makes me a little suspicious of some of our more vocal players, but I'm not quite sure yet who among them seem to have ill-intentions.