Description: hopefully it won't get flamed
tomster 785 - June 2, 2007 11:16 AM (GMT)
well here it is after some crits from zeid on PJ
(click on it to go to the topic)
so any crits from you guys?
tomster 785 - June 4, 2007 03:36 PM (GMT)
BUMP and an update
zeid - June 5, 2007 02:43 AM (GMT)
You cant post this piece as transparent on such a dark background. Its AA is designed for light backgrounds and it makes it look really bad because of its colours.
WAZU_1G34RTRN4 - June 5, 2007 07:30 AM (GMT)
That's something I often get wrong; if you pixel on a backgrond of one colour, chances are it'll look bad on another.
tomster 785 - June 5, 2007 07:03 PM (GMT)
ok here it is without the transperent BG
WAZU_1G34RTRN4 - June 5, 2007 09:53 PM (GMT)
tomster 785 - June 6, 2007 03:39 PM (GMT)
heres the topic
... now can I please just have some crits
teej - June 6, 2007 04:53 PM (GMT)
i liked the one with transparent background
than the one with the white...
since the piece is so small, i couldn't detect
any obvious flaw, and since this a robot (smething that can have odd shapes)
i cannot bring up anatomy evaluation for it.
so good job there tomster.
tomster 785 - June 6, 2007 04:59 PM (GMT)
Opacus - June 6, 2007 07:32 PM (GMT)
I kinda agree with Teej.
There's one point though: Maybe try more exciting lines? These are boring with only the basic shapes and all. Maybe a dynamic pose, some more exiting forms and all?