Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to Let's Talk Seashells!. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


 

 Fissurella angusta (Gmelin, 1791), Narrow Keyhole Limpet
Marlo
Posted: Feb 16 2009, 04:52 PM


LTS Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 2,012
Member No.: 2
Joined: 12-November 05



user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Fissurella angusta is very similar to the following species.

user posted image user posted image
Top
Bullas
Posted: Feb 17 2009, 05:59 AM


Unregistered









Great job Marlo. The F.angusta have always troubled me. Here is what I've come up with on them. Could be way off on my thoughts.
In the picture are Fissurella rosea,barbadensis,angusta that I have collected. I went to Abbott/Morris 1995(4th edition) for the description of F.angusta. They say- about 3/4 in long,rather flattish,somewhat pointed in front,brown around orifice. The what I have as angusta in the picture is nothing like the other two,so my question would be- if it's not a F.angusta then what did I find?
bullas

user posted image
Top
Marlo
Posted: Feb 17 2009, 01:26 PM


LTS Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 2,012
Member No.: 2
Joined: 12-November 05



Locality data would be helpful. Detail quality not too good on the "Angusta" shell, but I doubt that's it. Check the description of for D. listeri, although the orifice doesn't fit.
Top
bullas1
Posted: Feb 18 2009, 04:11 AM


Member


Group: Members
Posts: 51
Member No.: 1,622
Joined: 17-February 09



QUOTE (Marlo @ Feb 17 2009, 01:26 PM)
Locality data would be helpful.  Detail quality no too good on the "Angusta" shell, but I doubt that's it.  Check the description of for D. listeri, although the orifice doesn't fit.

Thanks Marlo- Hope this picture is better. They aren't D.listeri. They don't have the line running across the ribs. These were collected at Jupiter Inlet,attached under
"blowing rock" back in 1993. I don't have that much to go by for ID but here's another one that has the pictures of F.rosea,barbadensis and angusta -
The American Museum of Natural History-Guide to Shells. The picture shows the angusta with the dark line around the orifice.
bullas1

user posted image
Top
Susan J. Hewitt
Posted: Jan 14 2012, 10:53 AM


Bronze Member


Group: Members
Posts: 269
Member No.: 1,810
Joined: 22-May 11



I would call these F. rosea. The black line would not be enough to change my mind on this.

Until you have handled literally hundreds (or thousands) of F. rosea shells, it is hard to believe how variable it is as a species, in color, in elevation, and in sculpture.

From my experience in the Leeward Islands I would say that F. angusta is usually pretty flat, often has a surprisingly small orifice compared to the size of the shell, and often is almost stellate in outline. It also often tends to run smaller than F. rosea does.

But some shells of F. angusta do seem to intergrade with some shells of F. rosea.
Top
« Next Oldest | Discussions/presentation at the species level - Univalves | Next Newest »
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
InvisionFree gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.
Learn More · Register Now

Topic Options



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1155 seconds | Archive